Page 1 of 7

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 6:30 pm
by hellboy
Blair has published the February 2013 Tool Newsletter, and it contains an interview with Opiate reissue artist Adi Granov. Here's a snippet:

Q: First off, how did you get involved with the cover artwork for the 21st anniversary release of Opiate?

A: Adam and I met last year, and he was already familiar with my work, so we started talking about collaborating on various things. At some point some artwork for Tool came up and Adam asked me if I'd be interested in doing the art for the Opiate anniversary. I was very happy to do it!

Q: Prior to meeting Adam, were you a fan of Tool's music, and/or their artwork? If so, what were your first impressions of seeing the original cover art of Opiate?

A: I discovered Tool at a pretty significant point in my life, as a war refugee in former Yugoslavia. It was a desperate time, so the music was a significant means of escape. Tool's music really impacted me and I have been a fan ever since.

I've lived with the music for a while before, upon moving to the US, seeing the album art. I don't remember if I connected the meaning immediately, but I do remember the intensity of the image. It was intense and creepy, kind of terrifying. It was a while before I realised that the figure was a sculpture rather than makeup on a model.

Quite an interesting interview, especially where it talks about how he's reworked the original Priest figure from Opiate. Looking forward to the other interviews Blair has promised.



Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 6:41 pm
by James
I don't know how I feel about him, it's going to be possibly cringe inducing an adventure to see what direction he goes with the Opiate art. His work just strikes me as less quality than a lot of their album artwork, I've seen people who work absolute wonders with similar art to his and he just doesn't come across as well-suited to accompany the darkness of Opiate. But we will see! I hope he changes my mind.

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:01 pm
by Gwarden
Was hoping for any kind of new info, but alas, not yet.

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:04 pm
by fulcanelli
It sounds like this release will be all about the packaging only. Are the songs being remastered, redone, or is there anything music related at all?

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:08 pm
by hellboy
fulcanelli said
It sounds like this release will be all about the packaging only. Are the songs being remastered, redone, or is there anything music related at all?


Personally I'll be disappointed if there's no musical or video extras.

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:45 pm
by Ravenpig
Me three. Not buying it without that. I'm sure I'll run into someone who has it eventually and I'll check out the artwork there.

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:51 pm
by badkittygothgirl
I'm sure people will start posting pics when they get them.

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:36 pm
by Davvda
Confused by the fact that I haven't seen anyone ask this question already... Why 21st anniversary? What's special with 21? A 20th anniversary last year I'd understand but this, I don't quite get. Someone enlighten me.

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:49 pm
by hellboy
Davvda said
Confused by the fact that I haven't seen anyone ask this question already... Why 21st anniversary? What's special with 21? A 20th anniversary last year I'd understand but this, I don't quite get. Someone enlighten me.


I imagine they just didn't have their shit together in time.

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:51 pm
by ilikecheese
fulcanelli said
It sounds like this release will be all about the packaging only. Are the songs being remastered, redone, or is there anything music related at all?


A good question indeed.

*cue slow clap*

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:51 pm
by fulcanelli
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, .... The Fibonacci sequence. It probably has something to do with that.

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:53 pm
by Calfium Jay
As if Opiate is anything to get excited over anyway....

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:57 pm
by UndKeineZwEier
Davvda said
Confused by the fact that I haven't seen anyone ask this question already... Why 21st anniversary? What's special with 21? A 20th anniversary last year I'd understand but this, I don't quite get. Someone enlighten me.


It's old enough to drink in America.

 

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 9:03 pm
by ilikecheese
UndKeineEier said

Davvda said
Confused by the fact that I haven't seen anyone ask this question already... Why 21st anniversary? What's special with 21? A 20th anniversary last year I'd understand but this, I don't quite get. Someone enlighten me.


It's old enough to drink in America.

 


Hell, it's a goat balls-gobbling-for-crack, filthy, whore by now.

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:11 pm
by lucidcandle
i'm guessing (hoping) that the reason so much emphasis has been placed on the artwork is because the interview that was posted was with one of the artists. I do have a question though. usually i completely understand information having to wait to be approved but i've always assumed that it had to be approved by the band. in this case there are interviews with the band members that are waiting to be approved by the bands management. what reason could tool's management possibly have to edit information the band members themselves are giving? i'd welcome any thoughts on this, the only thing i can think of is band members checking to make sure no one else is giving away too much information or anything but this seems not likely, especially when its info on a release a month away. any thoughts?

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:46 pm
by ThatGuy
Calfium Jay said
As if Opiate is anything to get excited over anyway....


Are you kidding me? Everyone knows Tool sold out after Opiate.

lucidcandle said
i'm guessing (hoping) that the reason so much emphasis has been placed on the artwork is because the interview that was posted was with one of the artists. I do have a question though. usually i completely understand information having to wait to be approved but i've always assumed that it had to be approved by the band. in this case there are interviews with the band members that are waiting to be approved by the bands management. what reason could tool's management possibly have to edit information the band members themselves are giving? i'd welcome any thoughts on this, the only thing i can think of is band members checking to make sure no one else is giving away too much information or anything but this seems not likely, especially when its info on a release a month away. any thoughts?


The management's job is to maintain the 'esoteric' nature of Tool and keep us limited in knowledge on things Tool. Its part of the band's whole twisted "dont give away enough info for anyone to really know whats going on" philosophy. Consider them the Ministry of Truth.

 

Artwork might be cool. Its a breath of fresh air at least. Artwork may be the only exciting new thing about this 21 year anniversary nonsense.

 

 

 

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:02 pm
by snazzlefrass
lucidcandle said
i'm guessing (hoping) that the reason so much emphasis has been placed on the artwork is because the interview that was posted was with one of the artists. I do have a question though. usually i completely understand information having to wait to be approved but i've always assumed that it had to be approved by the band. in this case there are interviews with the band members that are waiting to be approved by the bands management. what reason could tool's management possibly have to edit information the band members themselves are giving? i'd welcome any thoughts on this, the only thing i can think of is band members checking to make sure no one else is giving away too much information or anything but this seems not likely, especially when its info on a release a month away. any thoughts?


Interesting. Those are my thoughts.

 

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:04 pm
by doors
Tool sold out when they released Lateralus. It was their most commercially successful album but not their best. After all Maynard called it their 'black album."

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:08 pm
by '][' [[]] [[]] ][,
There's a long list of things that TOOL fans would love to see come out of the TOOL camp.  I don't think an Opiate re-release was anywhere on that list.

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:11 pm
by badkittygothgirl
Your avatar  was basically my initial reaction to the news.

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 1:04 am
by The Boss
toolphishdhs said

doors said
Tool sold out when they released Lateralus. It was their most commercially successful album but not their best. After all Maynard called it their 'black album."


lol What?


Yeah, I know. Just ignore it.

 

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:03 am
by inequitude
Not upset to read of a move away from Alex Grey after a decade, but all the illustrations I see from this guy online seem to be... templated? CGI templates? His characters are super androgynous, and it doesn't strike me as a tactic that's gunning for intentional provocation (i.e. Brian Molko wailing in a pinafore)... moreso just a lack of talent. Bit weird. I really don't know enough about his work though.... see how it goes - sure everyone knows what they're doing, aye.

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:18 am
by hellboy
Not quite sure what you're talking about. I did a quick Google Image search and there's very little CGI stuff. I don't think he's the worlds greatest artist by any stretch, but his work seems quite reasonable.

What really counts though is his original stuff. There's plenty of Iron Man and other known characters there, but I'd like to see some of his original work (and can't be bothered Googling it myself).

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:20 am
by eyepod
This would be "left field"and pretty damn cool IMO:
This re release will be a 21 year old tool doing their own renditions of newborn tool's songs.
TOOL covering tool.