Stones or Beatles?

Post Reply

The Beatles or The Rolling Stones?

The Beatles
3
38%
The Rolling Stones
5
63%
 
Total votes: 8

User avatar
UndKeineZwEier
has a small dick
Posts: 8661
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:10 am
Location: (c is da toot of crakter)

Stones or Beatles?

Post by UndKeineZwEier »

Let's settle this

This is totes official too, so choose wisely.
Don't mow your lawn
User avatar
hellboy
Site Admin
Posts: 12217
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:01 pm
Height: 182cm
Contact:

Re: Stones or Beatles?

Post by hellboy »

I've voted for the Beatles, but I find that the Stones are more consistently better with their songs. The Beatles have more high points than the Stones though, but also many more low points.
User avatar
UndKeineZwEier
has a small dick
Posts: 8661
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:10 am
Location: (c is da toot of crakter)

Re: Stones or Beatles?

Post by UndKeineZwEier »

hellboy wrote:I've voted for the Beatles, but I find that the Stones are more consistently better with their songs. The Beatles have more high points than the Stones though, but also many more low points.
I'd agree with that. The Beatles have some great songs, but I find it really hard to actually sit through one of their albums, which is not the case with the Stones.
Don't mow your lawn
User avatar
the chill
Duck Hater
Posts: 386
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:40 am
Location: San Diego

Re: Stones or Beatles?

Post by the chill »

I voted for Beatles, but they are so different I think and the real poll should be The Rolling Stones or Led Zeppelin. I might be alone with this but I totally think the The Stones have a better song line up than Zep.
User avatar
hellboy
Site Admin
Posts: 12217
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:01 pm
Height: 182cm
Contact:

Re: Stones or Beatles?

Post by hellboy »

Led Zep are much much better than either of those bands
User avatar
UndKeineZwEier
has a small dick
Posts: 8661
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:10 am
Location: (c is da toot of crakter)

Re: Stones or Beatles?

Post by UndKeineZwEier »

hellboy wrote:Led Zep are much much better than either of those bands
I agree, and I think a lot of people that frequent this forum would also agree - thus making a poll like this pretty unnecessary.
Don't mow your lawn
User avatar
the chill
Duck Hater
Posts: 386
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:40 am
Location: San Diego

Re: Stones or Beatles?

Post by the chill »

But but but they stole a handful of songs! Haha. Well I guess I am in a huge minority. I used to love Led Zeppelin and I do enjoy them but when I am listening to music in the car The Stones just hit the spot.
User avatar
hellboy
Site Admin
Posts: 12217
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:01 pm
Height: 182cm
Contact:

Re: Stones or Beatles?

Post by hellboy »

Not convinced that Zep stole any more songs than most bands tbh.
User avatar
UndKeineZwEier
has a small dick
Posts: 8661
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:10 am
Location: (c is da toot of crakter)

Re: Stones or Beatles?

Post by UndKeineZwEier »

All of LZ's best stuff is original.
Don't mow your lawn
User avatar
Calfium Jay
Queric
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 11:31 pm
Height: 189cm
Location: Between the buttons!!!

Re: Stones or Beatles?

Post by Calfium Jay »

The Stones.

Especially pretty much everything from Their Satanic Majesties through to Goat's Head Soup. Unbeatable. Although I'm not really quite sold on Exile On Main Street. It's........ok.

-----------

Take away The White Album (which is sublime btw) and there's very little to get excited about The Beatles, imho.
'It is time for us to be doing what we have been doing every day. And that time is now'

Actual quote from Kamala Harris
Post Reply