Page 3 of 3

Re: Fallout: A Post Nuclear Role Playing Game

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:21 am
by hellboy
Combat is certainly harder, though some of the starter weapons seem pretty underpowered. Now that I have a decent gun I seem to be able to hold my own against at least entry level cannon fodder pretty easily.

The shooting certainly is better, and better than my initial assessment I reckon. I'm having a good time with the crafting and settlement stuff as well, both of which are right up my alley.

As to the "core" of the game, so far it's pretty much standard Fallout fare, which works just fine for me.

Re: Fallout: A Post Nuclear Role Playing Game

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:37 am
by UndKeineZwEier
Where would you rank it in the series order so far?

Re: Fallout: A Post Nuclear Role Playing Game

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:47 am
by hellboy
UndKeineZwEier wrote:Where would you rank it in the series order so far?
I'm going to disregard 1 & 2 as they are really quite different games. As it stands I'd say NV is still the best, with F4 close behind, and F3 being the "worst" (I still really enjoyed that though).

Re: Fallout: A Post Nuclear Role Playing Game

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 3:56 am
by ziggy23
Image

Re: Fallout: A Post Nuclear Role Playing Game

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 4:04 am
by UndKeineZwEier
That's the reason why I never take a companion with me in a Bethesda game.

Re: Fallout: A Post Nuclear Role Playing Game

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 10:55 pm
by hellboy
Sounds like a good reason to get back into Fallout 4:

https://bethesda.net/#en/events/game/fa ... 6/03/29/96